A legal brief is much more than a document; it is a strategic argument that weaves together the applicable law and the reasons why a lower court’s decision was flawed. This persuasive instrument is pivotal in appeals, where the primary task is to demonstrate how the judiciary erred in applying the law. Each appeal is distinct, requiring a meticulous, fact-driven approach and an in-depth explanation of the circumstances that gave rise to the case.
STRUCTURE OF A LEGAL BRIEF
A well-prepared legal brief consists of two main sections:
-
- The Legal Argument: This section outlines the key points of contention and supports them with relevant case law and statutes.
- The Appendix/Abstract: This part includes supplementary materials, such as transcripts and exhibits, which back up the main argument.
PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS
Before beginning the drafting process, it is crucial to address certain procedural prerequisites:
-
- Determine if the Order is Final: Confirm whether the order being appealed is a final judgment. If not, investigate whether it qualifies for an exception.
- Filing a Notice of Appeal: Ensure that the notice of appeal is filed on time, accompanied by the required fees.
- Case Information Form: Generally, but not all courts, require basic information about the appeal which includes the name of the parties, post-judgment motions/orders, and basis for the appeal.
Once these steps are completed, the court will issue a scheduling order outlining important deadlines, such as:
-
- Filing dates for the Appellant’s Brief, Appellee’s Brief, and Reply Brief.
- Any mediation sessions and their corresponding dates.
Note: Each jurisdiction has specific requirements for the appearance of paper briefs, including designated cover colors. Always verify the appellate rules for your jurisdiction to comply with the guidelines.
UNDERSTANDING THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE
An appeal must argue that the judiciary misapplied or misinterpreted the law. It is important to remember that most appeals are not successful due to the high standard required to prove judicial error or abuse of discretion. Here’s how to develop an effective strategy:
- IDENTIFY PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Start by analyzing whether there were procedural missteps, such as improper service of process or jurisdictional errors. Identify the governing statutes, rules, or codes relevant to these issues.
Move on to substantive issues, breaking down each element of the applicable law—whether related to contracts, torts, or another area—and align the facts of your case with these legal elements.
2. EXAMINE THE TRANSCRIPTS
Obtain and review the trial transcripts thoroughly. Pay close attention to statements made by the judge, opposing counsel, and your own legal team regarding rules of law, jury instructions, objections, and evidence handling.
Document what was admitted or excluded from evidence and the reasons for these decisions.
As you analyze the transcripts, keep detailed notes of the page and line numbers for later reference in the Statement of Facts or Statement of the Case.
3. RESEARCH CASE LAW
Identify precedents that support your argument. Utilize legal research tools such as Casetext and Thomson Reuters, which offer free trials, or established platforms like Westlaw and LexisNexis.
4. DEVELOP YOUR LEGAL ARGUMENT
Summarize the core issues and explain why the trial court’s decision was incorrect, providing logical and factual support for your position. This preparation will lay the groundwork for a compelling legal brief.
Stay tuned for more posts to guide you further in your appellate journey!
Arlene A. Smith-Scott, JD
Managing Director for DocWriteReview, LLC
Join me on my journey to help businesses grow!